Skip to content

feat(tempo): raise expiring nonce expiry and use nonce discriminators - #5360

Merged
jxom merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
jxom/expiring-nonce-window
Nov 1, 2026
Merged

jxom merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
jxom/expiring-nonce-window

Conversation

@jxom

@jxom jxom commented Nov 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Raises the default expiring nonce validBefore from 25 to 270 seconds, caps Relay.feePayer expiring nonce windows at 300 seconds (TIP-1093), and adds Transaction.expiringNonceMaxExpiry. Replaces the random past validAfter with a random nonce discriminator (TIP-1106).

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Nov 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
viem Ready Ready Preview Nov 1, 2026 9:12am UTC

Request Review

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Nov 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: c3a70a6

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
viem Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-01T09:09:08.698738Z c3a70a6 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 24dedc411d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/tempo/chainConfig.ts Resolved
Comment thread src/tempo/internal/relay/feePayer.ts Resolved
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Published viem@0.0.0-pr-5360-f21b98a under the pr-5360 dist-tag, which follows this pull request until it closes.

pnpm add viem@pr-5360
pnpm add viem@0.0.0-pr-5360-f21b98a

@jxom jxom changed the title feat(tempo): raise expiring nonce default expiry, cap fee payer expiring windows feat(tempo): raise expiring nonce expiry and use nonce discriminators Nov 1, 2026
jxom added 3 commits November 1, 2026 19:32
* fix: drop requested `feeToken` from fee-payer-signed fills

* test(tempo): add fee payer scenario table and fuzz suites

* docs(tempo): describe sender gas and fee token under sponsorship

* refactor: name the fee token shape in sponsored fills

* test(tempo): cycle key types per path, drop file-level describes, cover chain fee token default
@jxom
jxom enabled auto-merge (squash) November 1, 2026 09:06
@jxom
jxom disabled auto-merge November 1, 2026 09:06
@jxom
jxom merged commit 41801d8 into main Nov 1, 2026
33 of 34 checks passed
@jxom
jxom deleted the jxom/expiring-nonce-window branch November 1, 2026 09:06

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — c3a70a64 Deployed Nov 1, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant