Repository navigation
SDSC: Reconsider variant name scheme #165
Description
Why is the short variant hash appended twice?
[mkandes@login01 ~]$ . /cm/shared/apps/spack/0.21.2/cpu/dev/share/spack/setup-env.sh
[mkandes@login01 ~]$ module use /cm/shared/apps/spack/0.21.2/cpu/dev/share/spack/lmod/linux-rocky8-x86_64/Core
[mkandes@login01 ~]$ module load gcc/13.3.0-t46rsdv
Inactive Modules:
1) slurm
[mkandes@login01 ~]$ module load openmpi/4.1.8-4ex7oqp
Activating Modules:
1) slurm/23.02.7-qwmhq6o-qwmhq6o
The following have been reloaded with a version change:
1) zlib-ng/2.1.4-f3aqwo6-f3aqwo6 => zlib-ng/2.1.4-otfrjgj-otfrjgj
2) zstd/1.5.5-a6unagk-a6unagk => zstd/1.5.5-el7dac3-el7dac3
[mkandes@login01 ~]$ module list
Currently Loaded Modules:
1) shared
2) cpu/0.17.3b (c)
3) sdsc/1.0
4) DefaultModules
5) gmp/6.2.1-siwf7iu-siwf7iu
6) mpfr/4.2.0-lp44usi-lp44usi
7) mpc/1.3.1-sw4uskz-sw4uskz
8) gcc/13.3.0-t46rsdv
9) libpciaccess/0.17-mcmk6gg-mcmk6gg
10) libiconv/1.17-sbpsu2v-sbpsu2v
11) xz/5.4.1-3ccc2bb-3ccc2bb
12) zlib-ng/2.1.4-otfrjgj-otfrjgj
13) libxml2/2.10.3-u5bhlww-u5bhlww
14) ncurses/6.4-vxmqbkn-vxmqbkn
15) hwloc/2.9.1-raenanb-raenanb
16) lustre/2.15.2-nhfixh7-nhfixh7
17) numactl/2.0.14-zmmgl4f-zmmgl4f
18) bzip2/1.0.8-2dqjb6v-2dqjb6v
19) pigz/2.8-gnuvmhy-gnuvmhy
20) zstd/1.5.5-el7dac3-el7dac3
21) tar/1.34-vgozjui-vgozjui
22) gettext/0.22.3-pnkku56-pnkku56
23) openssl/1.1.1k-xqlkwu5-xqlkwu5
24) krb5/1.20.1-v55lent-v55lent
25) libedit/3.1-20210216-m76neoh-m76neoh
26) libxcrypt/4.4.35-bnur6is-bnur6is
27) openssh/9.5p1-bcnejst-bcnejst
28) libevent/2.1.12-ntjypwd-ntjypwd
29) pmix/5.0.1-ukntpod-ukntpod
30) slurm/23.02.7-qwmhq6o-qwmhq6o
31) knem/1.1.4-5iz5xmb-5iz5xmb
32) rdma-core/43.0-4cn6oay-4cn6oay
33) xpmem/2.4.6-sjtxr6s-sjtxr6s
34) ucx/1.14.1-npuqcqj-omp
35) openmpi/4.1.8-4ex7oqp
Where:
c: built natively for AMD Rome
[mkandes@login01 ~]$
Activity
mkandes commentedon Nov 24, 2025
No ~/.lmod.d config present ...
mkandes commentedon Nov 24, 2025
Seems to be limited to implicitly installed software applications + dependencies.
mkandes commentedon Dec 17, 2025
After running a refresh, it still seems that the HIDDEN_AS_IMPLICIT are not hidden.
And, of course, the double appended hash remains as well.
mkandes commentedon Dec 17, 2025
This is the current modules.yaml file. What happens if we revert to the prior '{name}/{version}/{hash:7}' format?
mkandes commentedon Dec 17, 2025
Let's first try and do a more in-depth refresh ...
No dice.
mkandes commentedon Dec 17, 2025
Switching to
/hash-format does not change anything.