refactor: use renderable guard for marks

[QDyanbing]

说明

• 使用 isReactRenderable 统一判断 mark label 是否需要渲染
• 保留现有空内容边界，并支持数字 0、NaN 等有效 React 内容
• 将 @rc-component/util 的最低版本提升到首次提供该 helper 的 ^1.13.0

验证

• npm run tsc
• npm test -- --runInBand
• git diff --check

关联 ant-design/ant-design#59193

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug 修复
  • 修复滑块刻度标记的显示判断，支持更多可渲染内容作为标记标签。
• 依赖更新
  • 更新相关工具库版本，提升兼容性与稳定性。

[vercel]

@QDyanbing is attempting to deploy a commit to the afc163's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 534bc1c8-da54-418f-9380-1675365adb29

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 02260ea and 54113f7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• package.json
• src/Slider.tsx

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review.

---

Walkthrough

Changes

Mark label 过滤

Layer / File(s)	Summary
更新 mark label 过滤逻辑 package.json, src/Slider.tsx	将 @rc-component/util 更新至 ^1.13.0。Slider 使用 isReactRenderable(label) 替换原有过滤条件。

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 54113

Slider mark labels now use React-renderability checks, preserving valid numeric content such as 0 and NaN while retaining empty-content handling. The dependency requirement is updated for the helper, and no current merge-blocking risk is identified.

Suggested reviewers: afc163, madccc

Poem

小兔捧着新工具，
滑块刻度排成行。
可渲染的标签留下，
旧的判断轻轻藏。
依赖升级步子稳。

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	标题“refactor: use renderable guard for marks”准确概括了主要变更，即使用可渲染内容判断逻辑筛选 mark 标签。标题简洁且具体。
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.66%. Comparing base (02260ea) to head (54113f7).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1094   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.66%   98.66%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines         751      751           
  Branches      224      233    +9     
=======================================
  Hits          741      741           
  Misses         10       10           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.