chore(deps): bump plugins/agentchat from 042fece to 4773078

[dependabot]

Bumps plugins/agentchat from 042fece to 4773078.

Commits

• 4773078 feat: attribute OpenClaw traffic
• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[clawsweeper]

Codex review: needs changes before merge. Reviewed July 29, 2026, 9:13 PM ET / July 30, 2026, 01:13 UTC.

ClawSweeper review

What this changes

The PR updates the plugins/agentchat external-plugin submodule pointer from commit 042fece to 4773078, which contains upstream OpenClaw-traffic attribution work.

Merge readiness

⚠️ Ready for maintainer review - 2 items remain

This PR should remain open: it advances an external plugin revision but does not include the generated AgentChat report and focused expectation updates required by this fixture-driven repository. The previous review raised that same blocker at the unchanged PR head, so the branch needs one narrow synchronization update before it is ready to merge.

Priority: P2
Reviewed head: 0821d4af3c24660439513feb4894778e5c67cf2a

Review scores

Measure	Result	What it means
Overall readiness	🦐 gold shrimp (3/6)	The update is narrowly scoped and focused checks passed, but the required generated fixture evidence is absent from the branch.
Proof confidence	🌊 off-meta tidepool	Not applicable: This bot-authored gitlink-only dependency update is evaluated through synchronized fixture artifacts and focused repository checks rather than external contributor runtime proof.
Patch quality	🦐 gold shrimp (3/6)	1 actionable review finding remain.

Verification

Check	Result	Evidence
Real behavior	Not applicable	Not applicable: This bot-authored gitlink-only dependency update is evaluated through synchronized fixture artifacts and focused repository checks rather than external contributor runtime proof.
Evidence reviewed	4 items	Repository fixture policy: The supplied full target AGENTS.md says plugin-inspector behavior or package-version changes must update both the source reference and generated report/test expectations. Branch scope: The PR’s only file change is the plugins/agentchat gitlink from 042feceb630c756fedc0e3fa6e97369da40bf4ed to 47730789fe339af107c080df66dda61a613b5fe0; no generated report or expectation files are changed. Prior-review continuity: The previous ClawSweeper review at the same head SHA raised “Update AgentChat’s generated fixture expectations.” The current head remains 0821d4af3c24660439513feb4894778e5c67cf2a, so that concrete blocker is still unresolved.
Findings	1 actionable finding	[P2] Update AgentChat’s generated fixture expectations
Security	None	None.

How this fits together

Crabpot inspects configured external plugin fixtures and records their results as generated reports and test expectations. A plugin submodule revision feeds the inspector, whose output must remain locked into the repository’s fixture contract.

flowchart LR
  A[AgentChat upstream plugin] --> B[Submodule revision]
  B --> C[Fixture configuration]
  C --> D[Plugin inspector]
  D --> E[Generated report]
  D --> F[Focused expectations]
  E --> G[Reviewable fixture contract]
  F --> G

Loading

Before merge

• Update AgentChat’s generated fixture expectations (P2) - This changes the external plugin revision but leaves the generated report and focused test expectations unchanged. Repository policy requires those outputs to move with a plugin-inspector/package-version update; otherwise any changed AgentChat result is neither reviewable nor locked in.
• Resolve merge risk (P1) - Merging only the gitlink can leave committed inspector reports and expectations stale relative to the external AgentChat revision, obscuring a changed fixture contract for future reviews.

Findings

• [P2] Update AgentChat’s generated fixture expectations — plugins/agentchat:1

Agent review details

Security

None.

Review metrics

Metric	Value	Why it matters
Patch surface	1 gitlink changed; 1 addition, 1 deletion	The entire behavior change comes from an external plugin revision, making locked fixture output the key review artifact.
Focused validation	2 relevant jobs passed	The AgentChat changed-fixture and fixture-lock security checks give baseline safety but do not prove generated output was synchronized.

Merge-risk options

Maintainer options:

1. Synchronize the fixture outputs (recommended)
   Commit the AgentChat generated report and focused expectations for revision 4773078, then rerun the existing changed-fixture validation before merging.
2. Pause the dependency bump
   Do not merge the revision update if its resulting fixture output cannot be reviewed and committed as a corresponding expectation change.

Copy recommended automerge instruction

@clawsweeper automerge

Special instructions:
Regenerate the AgentChat fixture report and focused expectations for submodule revision 4773078; preserve the narrow dependency-update scope and validate with the existing changed-fixture AgentChat check.

Technical review

Best possible solution:

Regenerate and commit the AgentChat-specific report and focused test expectations with the gitlink bump, so the external revision’s observed fixture output is reviewed and locked into Crabpot.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Yes. The source-level PR diff shows a plugin revision change without the generated report and test-expectation synchronization required by the repository policy.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

No. A gitlink-only update is not the best maintainable solution here because the repository requires the corresponding generated fixture outputs to be reviewed and committed with the version change.

Full review comments:

• [P2] Update AgentChat’s generated fixture expectations — plugins/agentchat:1
  This changes the external plugin revision but leaves the generated report and focused test expectations unchanged. Repository policy requires those outputs to move with a plugin-inspector/package-version update; otherwise any changed AgentChat result is neither reviewable nor locked in.
  Confidence: 0.98

Overall correctness: patch is incorrect
Overall confidence: 0.94

AGENTS.md: found and applied where relevant.

Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning high; reviewed against 55711523b2e2.

Labels

Label justifications:

• P2: This is a bounded dependency-maintenance change whose missing fixture lock-in creates a normal-priority review and compatibility gap.
• merge-risk: 🚨 compatibility: An external plugin revision can alter inspector-observed behavior, and the absent generated expectations leave that contract unreviewed.
• rating: 🦐 gold shrimp: Overall readiness is 🦐 gold shrimp; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🦐 gold shrimp.
• status: ⏳ waiting on author: ClawSweeper has contributor-facing work open and is waiting for author action. Not applicable: This bot-authored gitlink-only dependency update is evaluated through synchronized fixture artifacts and focused repository checks rather than external contributor runtime proof.

Evidence

Acceptance criteria:

• [P1] Run the repository’s existing isolated changed-fixture AgentChat check.
• [P1] Run the repository’s fixture-lock security check.
• [P1] Review the regenerated AgentChat report and expectation diff against upstream revision 4773078.

What I checked:

• Repository fixture policy: The supplied full target AGENTS.md says plugin-inspector behavior or package-version changes must update both the source reference and generated report/test expectations. (AGENTS.md:1, 55711523b2e2)
• Branch scope: The PR’s only file change is the plugins/agentchat gitlink from 042feceb630c756fedc0e3fa6e97369da40bf4ed to 47730789fe339af107c080df66dda61a613b5fe0; no generated report or expectation files are changed. (plugins/agentchat:1, 0821d4af3c24)
• Prior-review continuity: The previous ClawSweeper review at the same head SHA raised “Update AgentChat’s generated fixture expectations.” The current head remains 0821d4af3c24660439513feb4894778e5c67cf2a, so that concrete blocker is still unresolved. (plugins/agentchat:1, 0821d4af3c24)
• Focused checks: The changed-fixture AgentChat job and fixture-lock security job passed, which provides baseline validation but does not replace committing any output changes caused by the new external revision. (.github, 0821d4af3c24)

Likely related people:

• unknown: The provided context establishes the affected fixture and generated-expectation boundary, but the read-only command environment could not complete the required local history pass to identify a specific current-main contributor. (role: fixture-inspector area owner; confidence: low; files: crabpot.config.json, plugins/agentchat)

Rank-up moves

Optional improvements that raise the rating; they are not merge blockers.

• Commit the regenerated AgentChat report and focused expectations for the new submodule revision.
• Rerun the existing changed-fixture AgentChat and fixture-lock checks.

Rating scale

Score	Internal tier	Crab rank	Meaning
6/6	S	🦀 challenger crab	Exceptional readiness
5/6	A	🦞 diamond lobster	Very strong readiness
4/6	B	🐚 platinum hermit	Good normal PR; ordinary maintainer review
3/6	C	🦐 gold shrimp	Useful, but confidence is limited
2/6	D	🦪 silver shellfish	Proof or implementation needs work
1/6	F	🧂 unranked krab	Not merge-ready
N/A	NA	🌊 off-meta tidepool	Rating does not apply

Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality.
Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

Workflow

• ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
• Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
• A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
• PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
• Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
• Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
• Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
• Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

History

Review history (1 earlier review cycle)

• reviewed 2026-07-29T13:02:54.608Z sha 0821d4a :: needs changes before merge. :: [P2] Update AgentChat’s generated fixture expectations

[dependabot]

Superseded by #270.