Bug 1981626 Add new field denoting ordering of trial runs - #9757
Open
gopar wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for treeherder ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
gopar
commented
Aug 4, 2026
| "title": "Lower is better", | ||
| "type": "boolean" | ||
| }, | ||
| "trialsOrderedByRun": { |
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Only added to suite_schema and not subtest one. Should this be in both?
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yup, this should be in both. I think using the name orderedTrials might be better here as well.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bug: Add new field to performance artifact schema to denote that trials are ordered by their run
How are producers made aware of the new field? is that something I need to take care of as well?