Skip to content

Add RFC-0009: Extended Skill Bundles#27

Draft
jwm4 wants to merge 1 commit into
mlflow:mainfrom
jwm4:add-extended-skill-bundles-rfc
Draft

Add RFC-0009: Extended Skill Bundles#27
jwm4 wants to merge 1 commit into
mlflow:mainfrom
jwm4:add-extended-skill-bundles-rfc

Conversation

@jwm4

@jwm4 jwm4 commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Introduces RFC-0009, a companion to RFC-0008 (MVP Skill Registry, PR #26)
  • Extends bundle membership to register non-skill content (agents, hooks, MCP server references, and any other harness-specific component type) with a generic, free-form member_type field
  • Adds trace integration for non-skill members using the same mechanisms as RFC-0008 (context manager, trace manifest, autologgers)

Scope

This draft is intentionally limited to introduction, motivation, and user journeys. It contains no technical implementation details (no schema, store interface, API endpoints, SDK signatures, or CLI mapping). The goal is to get alignment on the approach before filling in specifics.

If reviewers would like more detail on any aspect, I am happy to add it. Alternatively, implementation details can be left to the implementer since the user journeys and motivation should be sufficient to define the scope.

Test plan

  • Review user journeys for completeness and clarity
  • Verify consistency with RFC-0008 (PR RFC-0008: MVP Skill Registry (Phase 1) #26) forward references
  • Confirm the generic member_type approach covers known harness component types

Posted by Bill Murdock with assistance from Claude Code.

Companion to RFC-0008 (MVP Skill Registry). Extends bundle membership
to register non-skill content with a generic, free-form member_type
field and adds trace integration for non-skill members.

This is an intentionally lightweight draft covering introduction,
motivation, and user journeys only.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@jwm4
jwm4 marked this pull request as draft July 23, 2026 20:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant