Skip to content

RAJAPerf concerns #41

Description

@MrBurmark

We mentioned a few concerns at the meeting today.

  • Make it more clear in the build section which versions of RAJA/camp/etc. go with what version of RAJAPerf. Probably mention our versioning scheme.
  • Update the doc to the relevant RAJAPerf patch version.
  • Differentiate between which versions of things can change (like the rocm/cuda/... version) and those that should stay the same.
  • Make it clear that they must use consistent versions of RAJA and RAJAPerf and that its best to keep up to date with RAJAPerf releases. They should want to do this anyway as RAJA should improve over time.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions