This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 11, 2021. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 11, 2021. It is now read-only.
ip rule management for RedHat completely different structure and approach #227
Description
Expected Behavior
similar approach as with Debian ip rule management #226
Actual Behavior
https://github.com/example42/puppet-network/blob/master/templates/rule-RedHat.erb
Steps to Reproduce the Problem
Specifications
Please add this info:
- Output of
facter -pon the failing node (at least the OS related facts) - Version of Puppet and of the module
- The relevant Puppet code and eventually Hiera data
Activity
alvagante commentedon May 7, 2018
@igarny not sure on what you miss here, the ipv6 family support on RedHat based on the family parameter (and not eventually with ipv6 directly specified in the rule entry?)
igarny commentedon May 8, 2018
All I'm stating is that both approaches for Debian and RedHat on ip rule management differ a lot, where it shouldn't. After all the implementation of the ip stack is very close in both flavors of Linux and the ip commands are the same.
Also there is a risk to continue to diverge, them by having people adding specifics for Debian in the respective templates.