Skip to content

FR: Support visibility #85

Open
Open

Description

@Mariusthvdb

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

the new visibility option is not supported, and we need to use conditional cards

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

have decluttering-card support visibility

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

conditional card
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

template:

card:
#   type: conditional
#   conditions:
#     - entity: switch.[[entity]]_privacy_mode
#       state_not: 'on'
#   card:
    type: picture-entity
    visibility:
      - entity: switch.[[entity]]_privacy_mode
        state_not: 'on'
    entity: camera.[[entity]]
  #     name: '[[name]]'
    show_state: false
    show_name: false
    camera_view: live

and card in dashboard:

  - type: custom:decluttering-card
    template: camera_privacy
    variables:
      - entity: bijkeuken
      - name: Bijkeuken

as you can see in the above yaml, I tried to replace conditional card with a straight replacement using visibility
it does not work, and the card is displayed no matter the visibility options set.

I also checked the core picture-entity card for support of the visibility option, and yes, that works nicely when used verbosely like

  - type: picture-entity
    visibility:
      - entity: switch.bijkeuken_privacy_mode
        state_not: 'on'
    entity: camera.bijkeuken
  #     name: '[[name]]'
    show_state: false
    show_name: false
    camera_view: live

Activity

  1. andreasbrett commented on Aug 26, 2024

    @andreasbrett
  2. Mariusthvdb commented on Oct 7, 2025

    @Mariusthvdb
    Author

    thx, yes, I did.
    But I 'need' it on decluttering-card, and hope to prevent yet another custom card..

    since the author is on a roll in button-card, hope this is the next project to modernize ;-)

  3. RomRider commented on Oct 7, 2025

    @RomRider
    Collaborator

    Funny how this card copies almost exactly what is done here 🙃 without even attributing some credits 🤷

  4. ildar170975 commented on Oct 7, 2025

    @ildar170975

    From readme of streamline card:

    Image

    Some people so easy use "not maintained" words... Then come to HACS and request to remove the card.

  5. RomRider commented on Oct 7, 2025

    @RomRider
    Collaborator

    I'll work on this, but I also have apexcharts-card to work on and it's another beast....

  6. andreasbrett commented on Oct 7, 2025

    @andreasbrett

    No release for 3 years, not a single commit in 3 years. I'd say it's pretty fair to assume this is not maintained. I do agree though that attribution should have been more prominent.

    From readme of streamline card:

    Image

    Some people so easy use "not maintained" words... Then come to HACS and request to remove the card.

  7. ildar170975 commented on Oct 7, 2025

    @ildar170975

    say it's pretty fair to assume this is not maintained

    What kind of maintainment people want from a WORKING card?
    I would call people "scandalmongers" who make a problem from nothing.

  8. Mariusthvdb commented on Oct 8, 2025

    @Mariusthvdb
    Author

    well, dont start a war ;-)

    I've asked for some attribution brunosabot/streamline-card#88

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions