fix(router): refresh retained parallel routes - #2880
Conversation
|
/bigbonk review for issues |
commit: |
|
Review: fix(router): refresh retained parallel routesReviewed all 29 changed files. This is a well-structured change: heavy runtime logic lives in the new typed Verified as correct
Non-blocking observations
No correctness blockers found. |
|
Review posted to PR #2880. SummaryI reviewed all 29 changed files in PR #2880, ran No correctness blockers found. The change is well-architected: runtime logic lives in the new typed Things I verified as correct:
Two non-blocking observations I posted:
|
Performance benchmarksCompared 0 improved · 2 regressed · 4 within ±1.5%
View detailed results and traces 🟢 improvement · 🔴 regression · ⚫ change below 1.5% · paired base/head |
|
/bigbonk review for issues |
|
UnknownError: ProviderInitError |
|
@james-elicx Bonk workflow failed. Check the logs for details. View workflow run · To retry, trigger Bonk again. |
|
/bigbonk review for issues |
Re-review: fix(router): refresh retained parallel routesRe-reviewed all 29 files after the retry. Ran Verified correct
Non-blocking observations
Non-blocking, ship-ready. |
|
Review posted to PR #2880. SummaryI re-reviewed all 29 changed files, ran Things I verified as correct:
Two non-blocking observations (same spirit as the earlier bonk pass):
Ship-ready. |
|
Backlog ownership check: I believe this PR fixes the seven non-cache failures from run 31439707085 / job 93624401572 in |
|
Independent review at exact head Reviewed the full 29-file diff, including supplemental refresh atomicity/abort/timeout behavior, persisted source/interception identity, history metadata, visible-commit merging, exact server-side interception disambiguation, request validation, cache-busting compatibility, and generated-entry wiring. Verification:
The change is parity-complete and ship-ready at this SHA. |
# Conflicts: # packages/vinext/src/server/app-rsc-cache-busting.ts # tests/app-rsc-cache-busting.test.ts
|
/bigbonk review for issues |
Review: fix(router): refresh retained parallel routesReviewed all 29 files at head. Ran the focused suites — Verified correct
Non-blocking observations (unchanged from prior passes)
Non-blocking, ship-ready. |
|
Review posted to PR #2880. SummaryI reviewed all 29 changed files, ran the focused test suites (18 + 371 + 1,590 = all passing), and confirmed Key things I verified as correct:
Two non-blocking observations (consistent with the earlier bonk passes):
Ship-ready. |
|
/bigbonk review for issues |
Review: fix(router): refresh retained parallel routesIndependent pass over all 31 changed files at head. Ran the focused suites — Verified correct
Non-blocking observations (unchanged from prior passes)
No correctness blockers found. Ship-ready. |
|
Review posted to PR #2880. SummaryI independently reviewed all 31 changed files, ran the focused test suites (21 + 431 = all passing), and traced the critical paths. No correctness blockers found. Key things I verified as correct:
Two non-blocking observations (consistent with the prior bonk passes, and I confirmed neither is exploitable):
Ship-ready. |
# Conflicts: # packages/vinext/src/server/app-browser-visible-commit.ts
|
/bigbonk review for issues |
Review: fix(router): refresh retained parallel routesIndependent pass over all 31 changed files at head. Ran the focused suites — Verified correct
Non-blocking observations
No correctness blockers found. Ship-ready. |
|
Review posted to PR #2880. SummaryI independently reviewed all 31 changed files, ran the focused suites ( Key things I verified as correct:
Two non-blocking observations (consistent with the prior bonk passes, and I confirmed neither is exploitable):
Ship-ready. |
…r2880-20260818 # Conflicts: # tests/app-browser-entry.test.ts
|
/bigbonk review for issues |
|
/bigbonk review for issues |
|
/bigbonk review for issues |
Summary
Deploy-suite failures fixed
Validation
Validated at a50c0c7: