Remove wrong documentation#2756
Open
MariJJhodl wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello @murchandamus, I'm Marij from RGB Protocol Association. I previously sent a PR to fix the errors in the file dedicated to client-side validation.
Here, I'm fixing another error.
I realized that the paper cited in the article is not valid and was not supported by the developer in the RGB-Protocol, now actively developing on v0.11.1.
Please allow me to remove it, so we don't confuse both our users regarding the right sources, which are rgb.info and docs.rgb.info.
Thanks for your patience and understanding.
MariJ