[webhooks] provide cloud tester

[capcom6]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added guidance for testing webhooks without a personal server.
  • Introduced the hosted Webhook Tester as a temporary endpoint for capturing webhook payloads.
  • Updated setup and troubleshooting docs to include additional webhook testing options and quick-start steps.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@capcom6, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 55 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7fcd444a-877e-4000-9aee-9b125bd621c8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 14824e5 and 5c941ff.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• docs/faq/webhooks.md
• docs/features/webhooks.md
• docs/getting-started/webhooks.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates documentation across three markdown files to reference a new hosted Webhook Tester service. Changes include a new FAQ entry, a new "Webhook Tester" section in the features guide with quick-start steps and constraints, and updated prerequisites/troubleshooting text.

Changes

Webhook Tester Documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Webhook Tester feature section and testing guidance docs/features/webhooks.md	Adds a new "Webhook Tester" section with hosted URL, quick-start session/endpoint flow, and a constraints table; expands "Testing" server setup guidance and the "No Webhooks Received?" troubleshooting item to reference the Webhook Tester alongside webhook.site.
FAQ and getting-started references docs/faq/webhooks.md, docs/getting-started/webhooks.md	Adds a new FAQ subsection explaining how to test webhooks via the Webhook Tester and updates the getting-started prerequisites bullet to mention it alongside webhook.site.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• android-sms-gateway/docs-web#72: Both PRs modify docs/features/webhooks.md, particularly the "Prerequisites" and webhook testing guidance sections.

Suggested labels: documentation

Suggested reviewers: android-sms-gateway maintainers familiar with webhook documentation

🐰 A tester hops in, endpoint in tow,
No server to run, just a URL to show,
Docs get a nudge, a session, a link,
Webhooks now testable quick as a blink!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title is concise and accurately reflects the addition of a hosted webhook tester documented in the PR.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying docs with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	5c941ff
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://fc413fce.docs-7wm.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://webhooks-cloud-tester.docs-7wm.pages.dev

View logs

[capcom6]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

[capcom6]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

[capcom6]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

[capcom6]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

[capcom6]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

[capcom6]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

[capcom6]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

[capcom6]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

[capcom6]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

[capcom6]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/features/webhooks.md`:
- Around line 331-361: The hosted Webhook Tester description in the Webhook
Tester section should explicitly warn users not to send production, sensitive,
OTP, or PII-bearing webhook traffic there. Update the copy around the quick
start/intro in docs/features/webhooks.md to add a clear privacy warning and
direct users to use their own HTTPS endpoint for any sensitive or production
webhooks, keeping the existing Webhook Tester guidance intact.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 93ffcf0b-57d7-4748-bb9e-318f39c8070a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 73bea84 and 14824e5.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• docs/faq/webhooks.md
• docs/features/webhooks.md
• docs/getting-started/webhooks.md