Skip to content

fix(fuzz): VortexError in file_io (#8249)#8302

Draft
vortex-claude[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
fuzzer-fix/issue-8249
Draft

fix(fuzz): VortexError in file_io (#8249)#8302
vortex-claude[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
fuzzer-fix/issue-8249

Conversation

@vortex-claude

@vortex-claude vortex-claude Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated draft fix for fuzzer issue #8249.

  • Target: file_io
  • Crash file: crash-10053bb7dbb3978fcb50a22c8acba85b774226a9

Claude reproduced the crash, applied a minimal fix, and added a regression
test. The full analysis, diff, and test output are posted on issue
#8249.

This is a draft: please review carefully before marking it ready. The
linked issue is closed automatically by the nightly retest workflow once
the crash no longer reproduces, so this PR does not close it on merge.

View Claude run

Automated fix for fuzzer issue #8249.

Signed-off-by: vortex-claude[bot] <274007616+vortex-claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@vortex-claude vortex-claude Bot added changelog/fix A bug fix fuzzer-fix A fix auto-generated from a fuzzer issue labels Jun 8, 2026
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 118 improved benchmarks
❌ 54 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1341 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation compare[63] 244.6 µs 360.7 µs -32.18%
Simulation compare[56] 229.5 µs 332.4 µs -30.97%
Simulation compare[62] 254.7 µs 368.9 µs -30.96%
Simulation compare[60] 248.3 µs 358.7 µs -30.76%
Simulation compare[61] 255.4 µs 367.6 µs -30.53%
Simulation compare[58] 245.5 µs 352.3 µs -30.31%
Simulation compare[59] 250.8 µs 359.3 µs -30.2%
Simulation compare[57] 246.1 µs 350.9 µs -29.86%
Simulation compare[54] 236.2 µs 335.4 µs -29.58%
Simulation compare[55] 241.1 µs 342.2 µs -29.54%
Simulation compare[52] 230 µs 325.5 µs -29.35%
Simulation compare[48] 212.2 µs 300.3 µs -29.32%
Simulation compare[53] 236 µs 333.3 µs -29.2%
Simulation compare[50] 226.9 µs 318.6 µs -28.78%
Simulation compare[51] 232 µs 325.6 µs -28.75%
Simulation compare[49] 227.5 µs 317.4 µs -28.32%
Simulation compare[46] 217.9 µs 302.2 µs -27.88%
Simulation compare[47] 222.8 µs 308.9 µs -27.88%
Simulation compare[44] 211.3 µs 291.9 µs -27.62%
Simulation compare[45] 218.2 µs 300.7 µs -27.41%
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing fuzzer-fix/issue-8249 (f1f062b) with develop (5e3aedb)

Open in CodSpeed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/fix A bug fix fuzzer-fix A fix auto-generated from a fuzzer issue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants