Repository navigation
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathREFERENCES.json
More file actions
1063 lines (1063 loc) · 43.7 KB
/
Copy pathREFERENCES.json
File metadata and controls
1063 lines (1063 loc) · 43.7 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
{
"schema_version": "2.1",
"version": "1.1.0",
"last_updated": "November 2026",
"project_scope": "anti-surveillance / face-obfuscation / makeup-adjacent artistic, research, and activism references",
"ordering_definition": "Default rendering order is newest first. Primary key year descending; secondary key closeness descending; tertiary key title ascending. The HTML page also exposes a genealogy mode that reverses the year order.",
"language": "en",
"closeness_definition": {
"description": "Integer 1-100 indicating how close a source is to the conceptual core of the project: face-centered anti-surveillance through appearance design, makeup, camouflage, or directly adjacent face-recognition attacks.",
"anchor_examples": {
"100": [
"Michelle Tylicki + Lauri Love — DAZZLE",
"Adam Harvey — CV Dazzle"
],
"20": [
"infrared / night-vision sensor disturbance references such as The Camera-Shy Hoodie"
]
},
"bands": {
"90_100": "direct face-centered anti-surveillance / makeup / camouflage references",
"70_89": "directly relevant face-recognition attack literature or strongly adjacent face-obfuscation work",
"40_69": "enabling or adjacent adversarial-vision methods",
"1_39": "peripheral or modality-shifted references, especially infrared / sensor-jamming / non-face-centric work"
}
},
"tag_definitions": {
"type": [
"artistic",
"research",
"activism"
],
"ghostati_testability_level": [
"direct",
"partial",
"indirect",
"contextual",
"no"
],
"intervention": [
"adversarial-ml",
"adversarial-optimization",
"digital-perturbation",
"decoy",
"environmental-perturbation",
"face-obfuscation",
"false-face",
"garment",
"glasses",
"hair",
"infrared",
"interactive-tool",
"light",
"makeup",
"near-infrared",
"optical",
"orbital-region",
"patch",
"pattern",
"performance",
"printed",
"projection",
"public-walk",
"representation-attack",
"sensor-aware-material",
"sensor-jamming",
"semantic-perturbation",
"shadow",
"structured-light",
"survey",
"taxonomy",
"textile",
"toolkit",
"wearable-accessory",
"workshop",
"asymmetry"
],
"target": [
"3d-face-recognition",
"certified-defense",
"deep-representation",
"depth-face-recognition",
"face-detection",
"face-recognition",
"face-verification",
"image-classification",
"machine-learning-models",
"nir-face-recognition",
"object-detection",
"public-space-surveillance",
"security-camera",
"sensor-disturbance",
"traffic-sign-recognition"
],
"domain": [
"3d",
"browser",
"digital",
"environmental",
"festival",
"near-infrared",
"optical",
"physical-world",
"printed",
"public-space",
"software-library",
"visible-light",
"wearable"
]
},
"references": [
{
"slug": "human-imperceptible-nir-face-attack",
"title": "Human-Imperceptible Physical Adversarial Attack for NIR Face Recognition Models",
"author": [
"Songyan Xie",
"Jinghang Wen",
"Encheng Su",
"Qiucheng Yu"
],
"year": 2025,
"link": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15823",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 22,
"description": "A physical attack on near-infrared face recognition using infrared-absorbing ink and optimized patches.",
"visual_hint": "nir_subtle_points",
"demonstrated": "The paper demonstrates a black-box physical adversarial patch for NIR face recognition, using infrared-absorbing ink, skin-reflection modeling, and optimized patch placement to improve attack success in digital and physical domains.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Extends camouflage to NIR-specific materials, which the browser’s visible-light pipeline cannot test.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "indirect",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can document the concept of localized face-region perturbations, but it cannot verify NIR absorption, NIR imaging, or infrared-specific recognition models without dedicated hardware and models."
},
"intervention": [
"infrared",
"patch",
"sensor-aware-material"
],
"target": [
"nir-face-recognition",
"face-verification"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"near-infrared",
"wearable"
],
"limitations": "The reported results are tied to NIR cameras, tested models, patch materials, subject set, and controlled acquisition conditions. Effectiveness against visible-light systems, production deployments, or newer NIR pipelines is not established by this reference.",
"reproducibility": "artifact-available",
"citation": "Xie et al., arXiv 2025",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15823",
"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15823",
"project": null,
"code": null,
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.15823",
"arxiv": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15823"
}
},
{
"slug": "accessorize-in-the-dark",
"title": "Accessorize in the Dark: A Security Analysis of Near-Infrared Face Recognition",
"author": [
"Amit Cohen",
"Mahmood Sharif"
],
"year": 2024,
"link": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51479-1_3",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 22,
"description": "A security analysis of near-infrared face recognition that adapts adversarial accessories to NIR-based systems used in access-control and high-stakes settings.",
"visual_hint": "nir_points",
"demonstrated": "The work tests NIR-based face recognition against physically realizable adversarial accessories, reporting high physical attack success across defended and undefended models.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Shows why different camera spectra require different camouflage tests.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "partial",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can approximate the visible placement of a wearable accessory around the face, but cannot test NIR capture, NIR-specific perturbations, or defended NIR models in the browser."
},
"intervention": [
"glasses",
"near-infrared",
"wearable-accessory"
],
"target": [
"nir-face-recognition",
"face-verification"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"near-infrared",
"wearable"
],
"limitations": "The result depends on NIR capture assumptions, model set, accessory realization, and experimental protocol. A standard RGB webcam test in Ghostmaxxing would not confirm the NIR-specific claim.",
"reproducibility": "code-available",
"citation": "Cohen and Sharif, ESORICS 2023 / LNCS 2024",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51479-1_3",
"paper": "https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-51479-1_3",
"project": null,
"code": "https://github.com/AmitCohen3/Accessorize-in-the-dark",
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51479-1_3",
"arxiv": null
}
},
{
"slug": "dazzle",
"title": "DAZZLE",
"author": [
"Michelle Tylicki",
"Lauri Love"
],
"year": 2023,
"link": "https://www.michelletylicki.info/dazzle/",
"type": "activism",
"closeness": 100,
"description": "An interactive salon by Michelle Tylicki and Lauri Love for teaching and testing anti-surveillance makeup.",
"visual_hint": "salon_mask",
"demonstrated": "The project demonstrates a salon-like interface for teaching Computer Vision Dazzle and testing camouflage against multiple facial recognition systems in an activist and public-learning context.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Combines makeup, model feedback and public workshops.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "direct",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can directly retest the browser-lab logic of applying face-region visual interventions and comparing detection or matching behavior before and after the intervention."
},
"intervention": [
"makeup",
"face-obfuscation",
"interactive-tool",
"workshop"
],
"target": [
"face-detection",
"face-recognition"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"browser",
"visible-light",
"festival"
],
"limitations": "Public documentation describes the project and its testing ambition, but does not provide a full reproducible benchmark, exact model list, or protocol. Claims should be read as project documentation unless the implementation and results are independently released.",
"reproducibility": "documented-project",
"citation": "Tylicki and Love, DAZZLE, 2023",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://www.michelletylicki.info/dazzle/",
"paper": null,
"project": "https://www.michelletylicki.info/dazzle/",
"code": null,
"video": null,
"doi": null,
"arxiv": null
}
},
{
"slug": "physical-world-optical-attacks-3d-face",
"title": "Physical-World Optical Adversarial Attacks on 3D Face Recognition",
"author": [
"Yanjie Li",
"Yiquan Li",
"Xuelong Dai",
"Songtao Guo",
"Bin Xiao"
],
"year": 2023,
"link": "https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2023/html/Li_Physical-World_Optical_Adversarial_Attacks_on_3D_Face_Recognition_CVPR_2023_paper.html",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 30,
"description": "Structured-light optical attacks on depth-image and point-cloud face recognition.",
"visual_hint": "projector_depth_face",
"demonstrated": "The paper demonstrates a structured-light attack that can affect point-cloud-based and depth-image-based 3D face recognition with fewer perturbations and resilience to random head movements.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Introduces depth reconstruction and structured light as targets beyond 2D matching.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "indirect",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing’s browser pipeline can discuss optical perturbations conceptually, but cannot reproduce structured-light 3D scanning, depth-image recognition, or point-cloud attacks."
},
"intervention": [
"structured-light",
"optical",
"projection"
],
"target": [
"3d-face-recognition",
"depth-face-recognition"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"optical",
"3d"
],
"limitations": "The setup requires structured-light 3D recognition assumptions and specialized acquisition. It is not evidence that ordinary visible AR makeup affects 3D systems in the same way.",
"reproducibility": "paper-available",
"citation": "Li et al., CVPR 2023",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2023/html/Li_Physical-World_Optical_Adversarial_Attacks_on_3D_Face_Recognition_CVPR_2023_paper.html",
"paper": "https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2023/papers/Li_Physical-World_Optical_Adversarial_Attacks_on_3D_Face_Recognition_CVPR_2023_paper.pdf",
"project": null,
"code": "https://github.com/PolyLiYJ/SLAttack",
"video": null,
"doi": null,
"arxiv": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.13412"
}
},
{
"slug": "camera-shy-hoodie",
"title": "The Camera-Shy Hoodie",
"author": [
"Mac Pierce"
],
"year": 2023,
"link": "https://www.macpierce.com/the-camera-shy-hoodie",
"type": "artistic",
"closeness": 20,
"description": "A DIY wearable that uses high-power infrared LEDs to degrade or overexpose night-vision security camera footage around the wearer’s head and upper body.",
"visual_hint": "hoodie_ir",
"demonstrated": "The project demonstrates a buildable garment that interferes with IR-sensitive security cameras by using the same infrared wavelength commonly used for night-vision illumination.",
"ghostati_relevance": "An example of sensor disturbance, distinct from face makeup or matching evasion.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "no",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing cannot test IR LED glare, camera auto-exposure interference, or night-vision capture in a standard browser AR pipeline."
},
"intervention": [
"infrared",
"garment",
"sensor-jamming"
],
"target": [
"security-camera",
"sensor-disturbance"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"near-infrared",
"wearable"
],
"limitations": "Its effect depends on camera sensitivity, exposure behavior, LED placement, distance, and lighting. It does not directly test face-recognition matching or browser-based face analysis.",
"reproducibility": "build-files-available",
"citation": "Mac Pierce, The Camera-Shy Hoodie, 2023",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://www.macpierce.com/the-camera-shy-hoodie",
"paper": null,
"project": "https://www.macpierce.com/the-camera-shy-hoodie",
"code": null,
"video": null,
"doi": null,
"arxiv": null
}
},
{
"slug": "shadows-can-be-dangerous",
"title": "Shadows can be Dangerous: Stealthy and Effective Physical-world Adversarial Attack by Natural Phenomenon",
"author": [
"Yiqi Zhong",
"Xianming Liu",
"Deming Zhai",
"Junjun Jiang",
"Xiangyang Ji"
],
"year": 2022,
"link": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.03818",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 35,
"description": "A physical-world adversarial attack that uses natural-looking shadows rather than stickers or conspicuous projected patterns, tested on traffic-sign recognition rather than face recognition.",
"visual_hint": "shadow_cast",
"demonstrated": "The paper demonstrates that optimized shadows can create stealthy black-box physical adversarial examples, with strong simulated and real-world attack results on traffic-sign datasets.",
"ghostati_relevance": "A reference for light and shadow interventions, tested on traffic signs rather than faces.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "contextual",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can use this as a conceptual reference for light and shadow as adversarial surfaces, but cannot validate the traffic-sign attack or transfer it to face recognition without a new experiment."
},
"intervention": [
"shadow",
"optical",
"environmental-perturbation"
],
"target": [
"traffic-sign-recognition",
"image-classification"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"visible-light",
"environmental"
],
"limitations": "The demonstrated target is traffic-sign recognition, not face detection or recognition. Any relevance to Ghostmaxxing requires cautious analogy, not direct transfer of the result.",
"reproducibility": "code-available",
"citation": "Zhong et al., CVPR 2022",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.03818",
"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.03818",
"project": null,
"code": "https://github.com/hncszyq/ShadowAttack",
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.03818",
"arxiv": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.03818"
}
},
{
"slug": "adv-makeup",
"title": "Adv-Makeup: A New Imperceptible and Transferable Attack on Face Recognition",
"author": [
"Bangjie Yin",
"Wenxuan Wang",
"Taiping Yao",
"Junfeng Guo",
"Zelun Kong",
"Shouhong Ding",
"Jilin Li",
"Cong Liu"
],
"year": 2021,
"link": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03162",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 95,
"description": "An adversarial-makeup method that generates eye-shadow perturbations around the eyes to attack face recognition.",
"visual_hint": "orbital_makeup",
"demonstrated": "The paper demonstrates a task-driven makeup generation method and fine-grained meta-learning strategy intended to improve black-box transferability, including digital and physical scenarios.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Tests makeup as an adversarial intervention on face recognition.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "partial",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can approximate orbital-region overlays and compare local recognition behavior, but it does not implement the paper’s adversarial optimization, meta-learning, or commercial-system evaluation protocol."
},
"intervention": [
"makeup",
"orbital-region",
"adversarial-optimization"
],
"target": [
"face-recognition",
"face-verification"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"digital",
"visible-light"
],
"limitations": "The reported performance depends on the models, datasets, optimization method, physical-printing or application process, and commercial APIs tested in the paper. A manually designed Ghostyle is not equivalent to Adv-Makeup optimization.",
"reproducibility": "paper-available",
"citation": "Yin et al., IJCAI 2021",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03162",
"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03162",
"project": null,
"code": null,
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.03162",
"arxiv": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03162"
}
},
{
"slug": "adversarial-attacks-against-face-recognition",
"title": "Adversarial Attacks against Face Recognition: A Comprehensive Study",
"author": [
"Fatemeh Vakhshiteh",
"Ahmad Nickabadi",
"Raghavendra Ramachandra"
],
"year": 2020,
"link": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11709",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 82,
"description": "A survey of adversarial attacks and defenses against face recognition.",
"visual_hint": "survey_grid",
"demonstrated": "The article surveys attack and defense methods, proposes taxonomies, compares criteria, and identifies challenges and future research directions for adversarial face recognition.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Provides categories for threat models, target stages, physical and digital attacks, and defenses.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "contextual",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can use the survey to classify experiments and limitations, but a survey is not itself a system or attack to retest."
},
"intervention": [
"survey",
"taxonomy"
],
"target": [
"face-recognition",
"face-verification"
],
"domain": [
"digital",
"physical-world"
],
"limitations": "As a survey, it summarizes prior work rather than providing one reproducible experimental setup. Some included systems and defenses may have changed since publication.",
"reproducibility": "survey",
"citation": "Vakhshiteh, Nickabadi, and Ramachandra, 2020/2021",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11709",
"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11709",
"project": null,
"code": null,
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.11709",
"arxiv": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11709"
}
},
{
"slug": "breaking-certified-defenses-shadow-attack",
"title": "Breaking certified defenses: Semantic adversarial examples with spoofed robustness certificates",
"author": [
"Amin Ghiasi",
"Ali Shafahi",
"Tom Goldstein"
],
"year": 2020,
"link": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.08937",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 35,
"description": "A semantic adversarial-example paper that uses large but perceptually plausible perturbations to attack robust classifiers and spoof robustness certificates.",
"visual_hint": "shadow_cast",
"demonstrated": "The paper demonstrates a Shadow Attack that can cause certified classifiers to mislabel images while still producing a spoofed robustness certificate.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Explores visually plausible transformations rather than pixel noise; it is not face-specific.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "contextual",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can borrow the idea of perceptually plausible visual transformations, but cannot retest certified robustness or the paper’s classifier/certificate setting."
},
"intervention": [
"shadow",
"semantic-perturbation"
],
"target": [
"image-classification",
"certified-defense"
],
"domain": [
"digital"
],
"limitations": "The work is not face-specific and addresses certified image classifiers rather than browser face matching. Relevance to Ghostmaxxing is conceptual and should not be presented as evidence for face-camouflage effectiveness.",
"reproducibility": "paper-available",
"citation": "Ghiasi, Shafahi, and Goldstein, 2020",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.08937",
"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.08937",
"project": null,
"code": null,
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.08937",
"arxiv": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.08937"
}
},
{
"slug": "dazzle-club",
"title": "The Dazzle Club",
"author": [
"Evie Price",
"Emily Roderick",
"Georgina Rowlands",
"Anna Hart"
],
"year": 2019,
"link": "https://emilyroderick.com/work/the-dazzle-club/",
"type": "activism",
"closeness": 96,
"description": "A London-based collective practice using CV Dazzle walks, workshops, films, and public-space research to draw attention to facial recognition and surveillance infrastructure.",
"visual_hint": "group_walk",
"period": "2019–2021",
"demonstrated": "The Dazzle Club demonstrates how face paint and CV Dazzle can operate as embodied public research, collective performance, and public education rather than only as a technical evasion method.",
"ghostati_relevance": "A model for public workshops and collective investigation of surveillance.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "contextual",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can support similar workshops and local tests, but it cannot reproduce the public-space performance, legal context, or collective embodied research of the project."
},
"intervention": [
"makeup",
"performance",
"public-walk",
"workshop"
],
"target": [
"public-space-surveillance",
"face-recognition"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"public-space",
"festival"
],
"limitations": "The project is primarily an artistic and activist practice, not a controlled technical benchmark. Its value is public research and awareness rather than a reproducible recognition-evasion result.",
"reproducibility": "artwork-documentation",
"citation": "The Dazzle Club, 2019–2021",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://emilyroderick.com/work/the-dazzle-club/",
"paper": null,
"project": "https://emilyroderick.com/work/the-dazzle-club/",
"code": null,
"video": null,
"doi": null,
"arxiv": null
}
},
{
"slug": "vla-visible-light-face-attack",
"title": "VLA: A Practical Visible Light-based Attack on Face Recognition Systems in Physical World",
"author": [
"Meng Shen",
"Zelin Liao",
"Liehuang Zhu",
"Ke Xu",
"Xiaojiang Du"
],
"year": 2019,
"link": "https://doi.org/10.1145/3351261",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 78,
"description": "A visible-light physical attack that projects adversarial perturbations onto a face to conduct targeted or untargeted attacks against black-box face recognition systems.",
"visual_hint": "light_beam",
"demonstrated": "The paper proposes VLA, a visible-light projection method for crafting physical adversarial perturbations on the face against black-box face recognition systems.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Changes captured appearance through optimized physical projection, rather than a browser overlay.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "partial",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can simulate a visible overlay on the face and measure local matching changes, but it cannot validate projector optics, camera-image formation, or the paper’s black-box attack setup."
},
"intervention": [
"light",
"projection",
"optical"
],
"target": [
"face-recognition",
"face-verification"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"visible-light",
"optical"
],
"limitations": "The result depends on projector/camera geometry, brightness, environmental lighting, attack optimization, and the target recognition systems. Browser AR overlays are not equivalent to physically projected light.",
"reproducibility": "paper-available",
"citation": "Shen et al., UbiComp/IMWUT 2019",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://doi.org/10.1145/3351261",
"paper": "https://www.thucsnet.com/wp-content/papers/meng_ubicomp19.pdf",
"project": null,
"code": null,
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.1145/3351261",
"arxiv": null
}
},
{
"slug": "art-toolbox",
"title": "Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0",
"author": [
"Maria-Irina Nicolae",
"Mathieu Sinn",
"Minh Ngoc Tran",
"Beat Buesser",
"Ambrish Rawat",
"Martin Wistuba",
"Valentina Zantedeschi",
"Nathalie Baracaldo",
"Bryant Chen",
"Heiko Ludwig",
"Ian M. Molloy",
"Ben Edwards"
],
"year": 2018,
"link": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.01069",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 55,
"description": "A Python library for testing machine-learning models with adversarial attacks and defenses.",
"visual_hint": "toolbox",
"demonstrated": "ART provides implementations, examples, and documentation for attacks and defenses across many model families and machine-learning frameworks.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Provides evaluation infrastructure rather than a face-camouflage technique.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "indirect",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing could conceptually integrate adversarial-evaluation workflows, but ART does not directly map to the current browser-only Ghostyle test loop."
},
"intervention": [
"toolkit",
"adversarial-ml"
],
"target": [
"machine-learning-models"
],
"domain": [
"digital",
"software-library"
],
"limitations": "ART is broad infrastructure, not a face-specific or physical-world camouflage result. Applying it to Ghostmaxxing would require additional model wrappers and experiment design.",
"reproducibility": "code-available",
"citation": "Nicolae et al., 2018/2019",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.01069",
"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.01069",
"project": null,
"code": "https://github.com/Trusted-AI/adversarial-robustness-toolbox",
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.01069",
"arxiv": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.01069"
}
},
{
"slug": "dpatch",
"title": "DPatch: An Adversarial Patch Attack on Object Detectors",
"author": [
"Xin Liu",
"Huanrui Yang",
"Ziwei Liu",
"Linghao Song",
"Hai Li",
"Yiran Chen"
],
"year": 2018,
"link": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02299",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 40,
"description": "A black-box adversarial patch attack against object detectors such as Faster R-CNN and YOLO.",
"visual_hint": "detector_box_patch",
"demonstrated": "DPatch demonstrates that a small, location-independent adversarial patch can attack both bounding-box regression and object classification in object detectors, with transferability across detectors.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Shows how patches can disrupt object detection; it is not face-specific.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "indirect",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can draw face-localized patches, but DPatch targets object detectors and requires detector-specific optimization that Ghostmaxxing does not implement."
},
"intervention": [
"patch",
"adversarial-optimization"
],
"target": [
"object-detection"
],
"domain": [
"digital",
"physical-world",
"printed"
],
"limitations": "The attack target is object detection, not face recognition. Transfer to face analysis is conceptual unless a new face-specific optimization and evaluation are performed.",
"reproducibility": "paper-available",
"citation": "Liu et al., SafeAI 2019 / arXiv 2018",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02299",
"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02299",
"project": null,
"code": null,
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.02299",
"arxiv": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02299"
}
},
{
"slug": "shapeshifter",
"title": "ShapeShifter: Robust Physical Adversarial Attack on Faster R-CNN Object Detector",
"author": [
"Shang-Tse Chen",
"Cory Cornelius",
"Jason Martin",
"Duen Horng Chau"
],
"year": 2018,
"link": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05810",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 38,
"description": "A physical adversarial attack on Faster R-CNN object detection that adapts robust transformation methods to real-world detector attacks.",
"visual_hint": "object_shape_distort",
"demonstrated": "ShapeShifter shows that physical perturbations can be optimized to survive real-world transformations such as distance, angle, lighting, and camera limitations in an object-detection setting.",
"ghostati_relevance": "A reference for testing physical attacks across changes in distance, angle and light.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "contextual",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can borrow its concern with transformations, but cannot directly retest Faster R-CNN stop-sign attacks or autonomous-driving scenarios."
},
"intervention": [
"patch",
"printed",
"adversarial-optimization"
],
"target": [
"object-detection"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"visible-light",
"printed"
],
"limitations": "The target domain is object detection, not biometric recognition. Its lessons transfer as methodology, not as a direct Ghostmaxxing result.",
"reproducibility": "paper-available",
"citation": "Chen et al., ECML PKDD 2018",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05810",
"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05810",
"project": null,
"code": null,
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10925-7_4",
"arxiv": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05810"
}
},
{
"slug": "agns-face-recognition",
"title": "A General Framework for Adversarial Examples with Objectives",
"author": [
"Mahmood Sharif",
"Sruti Bhagavatula",
"Lujo Bauer",
"Michael K. Reiter"
],
"year": 2017,
"link": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00349",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 90,
"description": "A framework for adversarial generative nets, including physical eyeglass-frame attacks on face recognition.",
"visual_hint": "generated_glasses",
"demonstrated": "The paper demonstrates adversarial generative nets that can satisfy application-specific objectives, including physical eyeglass-frame examples for face recognition.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Optimizes physical accessories, while Ghostyles use browser-rendered overlays.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "partial",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can retest the broad idea of face-region or accessory-like overlays, but not the generator training, eyeglass printing pipeline, or exact attack objective."
},
"intervention": [
"glasses",
"wearable-accessory",
"adversarial-optimization"
],
"target": [
"face-recognition",
"face-verification"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"visible-light",
"wearable"
],
"limitations": "The result depends on generated eyeglass-frame patterns, model assumptions, and physical realization. Browser overlays can approximate placement but not validate the original optimization or robustness claims.",
"reproducibility": "paper-available",
"citation": "Sharif et al., arXiv 2017 / ACM TOPS 2019",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00349",
"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00349",
"project": null,
"code": null,
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.1145/3317611",
"arxiv": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00349"
}
},
{
"slug": "adversarial-patch",
"title": "Adversarial Patch",
"author": [
"Tom B. Brown",
"Dandelion Mané",
"Aurko Roy",
"Martín Abadi",
"Justin Gilmer"
],
"year": 2017,
"link": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09665",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 50,
"description": "Printable adversarial image patches designed to make classifiers output a chosen target class across transformations.",
"visual_hint": "patch_sticker",
"demonstrated": "The work demonstrates printable universal patches that can cause classifiers to ignore other scene content and output a chosen target class across transformations.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Shows how a local pattern can dominate image classification.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "indirect",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can draw patch-like overlays, but the original paper targets image classifiers and requires optimization not present in Ghostmaxxing."
},
"intervention": [
"patch",
"printed",
"adversarial-optimization"
],
"target": [
"image-classification"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"printed",
"visible-light"
],
"limitations": "The paper is not face-specific. Its relevance to Ghostmaxxing is methodological unless a face-recognition-specific patch is optimized and tested.",
"reproducibility": "code-available",
"citation": "Brown et al., 2017/2018",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09665",
"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09665",
"project": null,
"code": "https://github.com/tensorflow/cleverhans/tree/master/examples/adversarial_patch",
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.09665",
"arxiv": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09665"
}
},
{
"slug": "accessorize-to-a-crime",
"title": "Accessorize to a Crime: Real and Stealthy Attacks on State-of-the-Art Face Recognition",
"author": [
"Mahmood Sharif",
"Sruti Bhagavatula",
"Lujo Bauer",
"Michael K. Reiter"
],
"year": 2016,
"link": "https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2976749.2978392",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 92,
"description": "Printed adversarial eyeglass frames for evasion or impersonation attacks on face recognition.",
"visual_hint": "glasses",
"demonstrated": "The paper defines physically realizable and inconspicuous attacks on facial biometric systems and realizes them by printing adversarial eyeglass frames.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Changes face matching through accessories rather than covering the face.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "partial",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can approximate glasses-like overlays and compare local matching behavior, but cannot reproduce printed-material effects, physical-camera capture, or the exact optimization pipeline."
},
"intervention": [
"glasses",
"wearable-accessory",
"adversarial-optimization"
],
"target": [
"face-recognition",
"face-verification"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"visible-light",
"wearable"
],
"limitations": "The results are tied to the target systems, printed patterns, imaging conditions, and experimental subjects. Newer recognition models or production systems require fresh testing.",
"reproducibility": "code-available",
"citation": "Sharif et al., ACM CCS 2016",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978392",
"paper": "https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~lbauer/papers/2016/ccs2016-face-recognition.pdf",
"project": "https://mahmoods01.github.io/publication/ccs16-adv-ml/",
"code": "https://github.com/mahmoods01/accessorize-to-a-crime",
"video": null,
"doi": "https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978392",
"arxiv": null
}
},
{
"slug": "hyperface",
"title": "HyperFace",
"author": [
"Adam Harvey"
],
"year": 2016,
"link": "https://adam.harvey.studio/hyperface/",
"type": "artistic",
"closeness": 92,
"description": "Adam Harvey’s false-face textile camouflage, developed with Hyphen-Labs, that attempts to redirect face-detection confidence toward surrounding decoy faces rather than the wearer’s real face.",
"visual_hint": "false_faces",
"demonstrated": "HyperFace demonstrates a ground-based camouflage strategy: instead of hiding the face directly, it supplies machine-readable false faces around it to distract specific detectors.",
"ghostati_relevance": "Extends interventions from the face to surrounding decoy patterns.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "partial",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can test surrounding decoy-face graphics against browser detection in a limited way, but the original HyperFace patterns targeted specific Haarcascade detectors and textile contexts."
},
"intervention": [
"textile",
"false-face",
"decoy",
"pattern"
],
"target": [
"face-detection"
],
"domain": [
"physical-world",
"visible-light",
"wearable"
],
"limitations": "The documented prototype targeted OpenCV Haarcascade-style detectors and is not designed or tested against modern deep CNN-based face detection systems. Its value as camouflage is explicitly temporary and system-specific.",
"reproducibility": "documented-project",
"citation": "Adam Harvey, HyperFace, 2016/2017",
"links": {
"canonical": "https://adam.harvey.studio/hyperface/",
"paper": null,
"project": "https://adam.harvey.studio/hyperface/",
"code": null,
"video": null,
"doi": null,
"arxiv": null
}
},
{
"slug": "adversarial-manipulation-deep-representations",
"title": "Adversarial Manipulation of Deep Representations",
"author": [
"Sara Sabour",
"Yanshuai Cao",
"Fartash Faghri",
"David J. Fleet"
],
"year": 2015,
"link": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05122",
"type": "research",
"closeness": 45,
"description": "A theoretical reference showing that an image’s internal deep-network representation can be manipulated to resemble another image while remaining visually similar to the original.",
"visual_hint": "latent_match",
"demonstrated": "The paper demonstrates feature adversaries: small perturbations that make internal DNN representations mimic different natural images, raising questions about what representations encode.",
"ghostati_relevance": "A reference for studying changes in learned representations, beyond output labels.",
"ghostati_testability": {
"level": "contextual",
"reason": "Ghostmaxxing can discuss representation shifts, but it does not expose or optimize internal DNN layers in the current browser pipeline."
},
"intervention": [
"digital-perturbation",
"representation-attack"
],
"target": [
"deep-representation",
"image-classification"