Skip to content

Question: QT licensing question #170

@iyobo

Description

@iyobo

I personally don't like QT licensing headaches and the complexities involved in them.

I would like to create a closed-source, potentially commercial node-gui desktop app and use this to pack the app in a manner such that it can hopefully satisfy QT's LGPL licensing limitations.

Can I simply trust that the result of this packer can be distributed to potential customers without thinking about QT "stuff" and licensing?

Or do I still have to send my users a link and have them install QT by themselves?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions